🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". A law may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a leading peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding parental consent for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to copy this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Beyond these regions, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.